← AI Transformation Suite Statement of Work — SOW-01

Year 1: Foundation & Flagship (BRD-01)

Download Word

Statement of Work 01

Year 1 — Foundation & Flagship (BRD-01: Claims & Prior Authorization AI)
Issued under the Master Consulting Services Agreement and the "Project Catalyst" Program Charter, dated August 3, 2026
ClientACME Highland Health, a national health insurance company
Service ProviderPulaski Advisory Group, a management and technology consulting firm
Engagement LeadC. Tyrrell, Program Director
Executive SponsorM. Kavanagh, Chief Operating Officer, ACME Highland Health
SOW Effective DateAugust 17, 2026
TermAug 17, 2026 – Sep 30, 2027 (13.5 months)
Fee$27,720,000 (Year 1 of the $99,000,000 total Program budget)
Version1.0

1. Definitions

2. Relationship to Master Agreement and Program Charter

3. Background & Purpose

This Statement of Work is issued under, and incorporates by reference, the Program Charter for "Project Catalyst" (the ACME Highland Health AI Transformation Program), dated August 3, 2026. The Charter authorizes a 36.5-month, three-year program delivered across three annual legs of scope; this SOW governs the first leg only — Year 1, Foundation & Flagship — and does not by itself commit either party to Years 2 or 3, which are governed by their own, separately-executed Statements of Work (SOW-02, SOW-03) issued at the start of their respective years following Client's separate budget approval for each subsequent Year.

Year 1 establishes the governance, platform, and organizational foundation the entire Program depends on, and delivers the first production AI capability: Claims & Prior Authorization AI (BRD-01), the workstream most directly tied to the CMS-0057-F regulatory deadline and the competitive pressure described in the Charter.

4. Scope of Services

Phase 0 — AI Readiness & Governance Foundation

Phase 1 — Platform Foundation & BRD-01 Delivery

Out of Scope for This SOW

5. Approach

Year 1 is sequenced so that governance exists before anything is built. Phase 0 stands up the AI Governance and Center of Excellence function, Independent Model Validation as an organizationally separate second line, and the Data Privacy, Cybersecurity and Clinical Policy functions, before the first BRD-01 model is trained. That order is deliberate: a model validated by the team that built it has not been validated, and retrofitting separation after a model is in production means revalidating work already relied upon.

The Consultant works assessment-first. The AI readiness assessment across data, technology and organizational dimensions establishes what the Client actually has rather than what its architecture diagrams claim, and the regulatory mapping against CMS-0057-F, state AI-in-insurance requirements and the NAIC model bulletin fixes the compliance boundary before design choices harden. Both are cheap to do first and expensive to discover later.

Vendor selection is run as an evaluation with an executed contract as its deliverable, not as a recommendation. A selection that ends in a preferred option leaves the Client to negotiate alone, at the point its alternatives have already been dismissed.

Requirements are elaborated through JAD sessions with mandatory Legal, Compliance, Enterprise Architecture and Cybersecurity participation. Mandatory means the session does not proceed without them: in a regulated payer environment the constraints those functions carry are not review comments, they are inputs, and hearing them at design review costs a rebuild.

6. Deliverables

DeliverableTarget Date
AI Readiness Assessment ReportSep 25, 2026
CoE Charter & Governance Framework v1Nov 6, 2026
Platform Vendor Selection & Executed ContractsNov 6, 2026
BRD-01 Requirements & Specification PackageDec 18, 2026
Data & Cloud AI Platform Foundation — LiveMar 12, 2027
BRD-01 Model Validation Certification (Pre-Pilot)May 28, 2027
Claims & Prior Authorization AI — Pilot Go-LiveJun 25, 2027
Claims & Prior Authorization AI — Full Production ScaleSep 30, 2027
Year 1 Program Status Reporting (monthly, cumulative)Throughout term

7. Staffing

Consultant will provide onshore and offshore consulting staff across Program Leadership & PMO, Legal, Compliance, AI Governance & CoE, Enterprise Architecture, Independent Model Validation, Data Privacy Office, Cybersecurity, Clinical/Medical Policy, Data & Cloud Platform engineering, and the BRD-01 delivery team, per the roles and rates in the Program's Resource Plan. Client will provide Executive Steering Board participation, SOX/Financial Controls, Program Finance, IT Operations liaison, HR/Workforce Planning, Corporate Communications, and clinical/UM subject-matter experts. Approximately 185–205 of the Program's 262-person life-of-program roster are active at peak during Year 1. The Member & Provider Experience AI and Underwriting & Risk AI delivery teams (BRD-02/BRD-03, 36 people combined) and the Customer UX / Design team are not engaged under this SOW and ramp on under SOW-02. The Quality Assurance & Testing team engages from the BRD-01 test phase, and the Client's User Acceptance Testing team engages for BRD-01 UAT cycles. Consultant may substitute personnel of substantially equivalent skill and experience upon notice to Client's Program Director liaison, provided such substitution does not materially disrupt Deliverable timelines.

The table below sets out the functions engaged under this SOW and their peak concurrent staffing. Headcount reflects peak concurrency within the year, not the Program's 262-person life-of-program roster, which ramps on and off by phase.

Function / TeamPeak EngagedStaffing ModelRole in This Year
Program Leadership & PMO16Pulaski onshore + ClientProgram direction, controls, EVM reporting
AI Governance & Center of Excellence12Pulaski onshoreCoE charter, governance framework, board stand-up
Enterprise Architecture8MixedArchitecture authority, EARB review
Data & Cloud AI Platform20Onshore + offshorePlatform foundation build to Mar 12, 2027 go-live
Claims & Prior Authorization AI (BRD-01)28Onshore + offshoreFlagship delivery to production
Quality Assurance & Testing18Onshore + offshoreEngages from BRD-01 test phase
User Acceptance Testing11Client (non-billable)BRD-01 UAT cycles and sign-off
Independent Model Validation6Pulaski onshoreSecond-line validation gate
Cybersecurity / InfoSec10MixedThreat modeling, controls, penetration testing
Legal6Client onshore onlyContract, liability and IP review
Compliance7Client onshore onlyRegulatory review and liaison
SOX / Financial Controls6Client onshore onlyControls testing on payment-affecting scope
Data Privacy Office5Client onshore onlyDPIA, PHI controls assurance
Clinical / Medical Policy & Informatics6ClientUtilization-management SME input
IT Operations / Infrastructure10ClientEnvironments, cutover, operations readiness
Change Management & Training8MixedAdoption, training, readiness
Program Finance6ClientBudget, EVM, invoice reconciliation
HR / Workforce Planning6ClientStaffing ramp and onboarding
Corporate Communications4ClientStakeholder communications
Vendor / SaaS Partner Management4MixedPlatform vendor selection and contracting
Customer Service Operations8ClientOperational readiness for BRD-01
Year 1 peak concurrency205Of the 262-person life-of-program roster. Excludes BRD-02 (22), BRD-03 (14), Customer UX / Design (8) and the Executive Steering & Governance Board (9).

8. Fees, Payment Schedule & Acceptance

Milestone PaymentAmountDue Upon
SOW Execution / Mobilization$4,160,000SOW effective date
Phase 0 Complete$5,540,000CoE Charter & Governance Framework v1 sign-off
BRD-01 Requirements Sign-off$4,160,000JAD series complete, requirements approved
Platform Foundation Live$5,540,000Data & Cloud AI Platform Foundation acceptance
BRD-01 Pilot Go-Live$4,160,000Pilot acceptance by Executive Steering Board
BRD-01 Full Production Scale$4,160,000Year 1 Closeout acceptance
TOTAL YEAR 1 FEE$27,720,000

Change Orders

Acceptance Criteria

9. Service Levels & Performance Measures

Consultant performance under this SOW is measured against the following service levels. Measures are reported monthly by the PMO to the Executive Steering Board as part of standard program reporting, and reviewed formally at each phase gate. Persistent failure to meet a service level is a material performance issue under Section 16.

Performance MeasureTargetMeasurement BasisRemedy
Milestone delivery to agreed dates≥ 95% on timeMilestone acceptance recordRecovery plan within 10 business days; no milestone payment until accepted
Deliverable first-pass acceptance≥ 90%Client acceptance log (Section 8)Rework performed at Consultant's cost
Critical / high-severity defects escaping to production0 criticalPost-release defect logHypercare remediation at no additional charge
Key-personnel continuity≤ 10% unplanned turnover per yearQuarterly staffing reviewReplacement of substantially equivalent skill within 15 business days
Independent Model Validation turnaround5–10 business days per submissionIMV queue logEscalation to the AI Governance Board
Security incidents attributable to Consultant0InfoSec incident logImmediate remediation and root-cause analysis
Monthly program & EVM reporting100% delivered on cadencePMO reporting recordEscalation to Program Director

Service levels are measured only against work within Consultant's control. Delays caused by Client dependencies described in Section 10, or by Client-directed changes processed under the Program's change-control procedure, are excluded from the measurement.

10. Client Responsibilities & Assumptions

11. Independent Contractor Status

12. Confidentiality

13. Data Protection, Privacy & Business Associate Terms

14. Intellectual Property Ownership

15. Representations and Warranties

16. Indemnification

17. Limitation of Liability

18. Insurance

19. Non-Solicitation

20. Force Majeure

21. Assignment

22. Dispute Resolution & Governing Law

23. Notices

24. Entire Agreement; Order of Precedence; Counterparts

25. Approval

 

M. Kavanagh, Executive Sponsor / COO, ACME Highland Health
 

C. Tyrrell, Program Director, Pulaski Advisory Group