← AI Transformation Suite Statement of Work — SOW-03

Year 3: Optimization & Sustain

Download Word

Statement of Work 03

Year 3 — Optimization & Sustain (Enterprise Integration of BRD-01, BRD-02, BRD-03)
Issued under the Master Consulting Services Agreement and the "Project Catalyst" Program Charter, dated August 3, 2026
ClientACME Highland Health, a national health insurance company
Service ProviderPulaski Advisory Group, a management and technology consulting firm
Engagement LeadC. Tyrrell, Program Director
Executive SponsorM. Kavanagh, Chief Operating Officer, ACME Highland Health
SOW Effective DateJanuary 2, 2029
TermJan 2, 2029 – Aug 29, 2029 (8 months)
Fee$29,700,000 (Year 3 of the $99,000,000 total Program budget)
Version1.0
Predecessor SOWsSOW-01 (Year 1) and SOW-02 (Year 2), completed Sep 30, 2027 and Dec 15, 2028 respectively

1. Definitions

2. Relationship to Master Agreement and Program Charter

3. Background & Purpose

This Statement of Work is issued under the Program Charter for "Project Catalyst," following Client's acceptance of all Year 1 and Year 2 Deliverables under SOW-01 and SOW-02, including full production scale of all three BRDs (Claims & Prior Authorization AI, Member & Provider Experience AI, and Underwriting & Risk AI). This SOW governs the Program's final leg.

Year 3 does not deliver new AI capability; it hardens, integrates, and institutionalizes what Years 1 and 2 built — enterprise-wide integration across all three BRDs, MLOps maturity, a formal benefits realization audit against the baselines set in Phase 0, and the transition of the AI Governance & Center of Excellence, Independent Model Validation, and Data Privacy Office into permanent Client steady-state operations, so governance continues after this SOW, and the Program itself, ends.

4. Scope of Services

Enterprise Integration & MLOps Maturity

Benefits Realization & Program Closeout

Out of Scope for This SOW

5. Approach

Year 3 stops adding capability and starts making what exists survivable. The three BRDs were built as separate workstreams and are integrated here as a single enterprise AI capability, with cross-workstream data flows and shared monitoring — the integration testing is where assumptions each workstream made about the others become visible.

MLOps maturity is the year's substance: automated retraining pipelines, drift detection and incident-response runbooks for all three production models. The reasoning is that a model degrades quietly. Unlike an outage, drift produces answers the whole time it is getting worse, so detection has to be instrumented rather than noticed.

Independent Model Validation performs a full re-certification pass across all three BRDs against real production data — a full year for BRD-01, partial for BRD-02 and BRD-03. Re-certification against production data is a different test from the pre-release one: it asks whether the model still behaves as validated on the population it actually met.

Closeout is evidence-led. The Benefits Realization Audit measures actual outcomes rather than restating the business case, and the Consultant hands over to Client operation with runbooks that assume the reader was not present for the build.

6. Deliverables

DeliverableTarget Date
Enterprise Integration Certification (All Three BRDs)Apr 15, 2029
MLOps Maturity Assessment & Uplift CompleteJun 30, 2029
Full Independent Model Validation Re-Certification (All Three BRDs)Jun 30, 2029
Benefits Realization ReportJul 31, 2029
CoE Steady-State Transition Plan & Formal HandoverAug 15, 2029
Program Closeout Report & Lessons Learned RegisterAug 29, 2029
Year 3 Program Status Reporting (monthly, cumulative)Throughout term

7. Staffing

Consultant staffing tapers through Year 3 as workstreams transition to steady-state; the Program Leadership & PMO, AI Governance & CoE, Independent Model Validation, Enterprise Architecture, and Data Privacy Office teams remain active through Closeout to execute the transition to Client steady-state operations, while the three BRD delivery teams wind down to a smaller production-support presence. Client's HR/Workforce Planning and Corporate Communications teams lead the internal transition communication and staffing plan for the functions being handed over. Approximately 100–120 of the 262-person life-of-program roster remain active at Year 3's start, tapering to a small permanent Client-side steady-state team by Program Closeout. The Quality Assurance & Testing and User Acceptance Testing teams wind down following the final BRD-03 production acceptance, retaining only the capacity required for regression testing during optimization and retraining cycles.

The table below sets out the functions engaged under this SOW and their peak concurrent staffing. Headcount reflects peak concurrency within the year, not the Program's 262-person life-of-program roster, which ramps on and off by phase.

Function / TeamPeak EngagedStaffing ModelRole in This Year
Program Leadership & PMO14Pulaski onshore + ClientProgram direction through closeout
AI Governance & Center of Excellence12Pulaski onshoreGovernance handover to permanent CoE
Enterprise Architecture6MixedArchitecture simplification and tech-debt reduction
Data & Cloud AI Platform14Onshore + offshoreOptimization, then steady-state handover
Claims & Prior Authorization AI (BRD-01)8Onshore + offshoreProduction support and retraining
Member & Provider Experience AI (BRD-02)8Onshore + offshoreProduction support and retraining
Underwriting & Risk AI (BRD-03)8Onshore + offshoreProduction support and retraining
Quality Assurance & Testing8Onshore + offshoreRegression testing for retraining cycles
User Acceptance Testing5Client (non-billable)Final acceptance and regression confirmation
Independent Model Validation6Pulaski onshoreAnnual model re-validation cycle
Cybersecurity / InfoSec6MixedOngoing controls assurance
Legal4Client onshore onlyContract and vendor closeout
Compliance5Client onshore onlyRegulatory monitoring and audit
SOX / Financial Controls4Client onshore onlyFinancial close and controls testing
Data Privacy Office4Client onshore onlyPrivacy assurance in steady state
IT Operations / Infrastructure10ClientSteady-state operations transition
Change Management & Training6MixedFinal adoption reinforcement
Program Finance6ClientBenefits audit and financial close
HR / Workforce Planning4ClientRoll-off and workforce redeployment
Corporate Communications3ClientTransition and closeout communications
Customer Service Operations10ClientSteady-state operation of delivered capability
Year 3 opening concurrency151Of the 262-person life-of-program roster, tapering through the year to a permanent Client steady-state team.

8. Fees, Payment Schedule & Acceptance

Milestone PaymentAmountDue Upon
SOW Execution / Mobilization$3,981,000SOW effective date
Enterprise Integration Certification$6,635,000All three BRDs certified integrated
MLOps Maturity & Re-Certification Complete$6,635,000Independent Model Validation sign-off
Benefits Realization Report Accepted$3,981,000Executive Steering Board acceptance
CoE Steady-State Transition & Program Closeout$5,308,000Final Closeout sign-off
TOTAL YEAR 3 FEE$29,700,000

Change Orders

Acceptance Criteria

9. Service Levels & Performance Measures

Consultant performance under this SOW is measured against the following service levels. Measures are reported monthly by the PMO to the Executive Steering Board as part of standard program reporting, and reviewed formally at each phase gate. Persistent failure to meet a service level is a material performance issue under Section 16.

Performance MeasureTargetMeasurement BasisRemedy
Milestone delivery to agreed dates≥ 95% on timeMilestone acceptance recordRecovery plan within 10 business days; no milestone payment until accepted
Deliverable first-pass acceptance≥ 90%Client acceptance log (Section 8)Rework performed at Consultant's cost
Critical / high-severity defects escaping to production0 criticalPost-release defect logHypercare remediation at no additional charge
Key-personnel continuity≤ 10% unplanned turnover per yearQuarterly staffing reviewReplacement of substantially equivalent skill within 15 business days
Independent Model Validation turnaround5–10 business days per submissionIMV queue logEscalation to the AI Governance Board
Security incidents attributable to Consultant0InfoSec incident logImmediate remediation and root-cause analysis
Monthly program & EVM reporting100% delivered on cadencePMO reporting recordEscalation to Program Director

Service levels are measured only against work within Consultant's control. Delays caused by Client dependencies described in Section 10, or by Client-directed changes processed under the Program's change-control procedure, are excluded from the measurement.

10. Client Responsibilities & Assumptions

11. Independent Contractor Status

12. Confidentiality

13. Data Protection, Privacy & Business Associate Terms

14. Intellectual Property Ownership

15. Representations and Warranties

16. Indemnification

17. Limitation of Liability

18. Insurance

19. Non-Solicitation

20. Force Majeure

21. Assignment

22. Dispute Resolution & Governing Law

23. Notices

24. Entire Agreement; Order of Precedence; Counterparts

25. Approval

 

M. Kavanagh, Executive Sponsor / COO, ACME Highland Health
 

C. Tyrrell, Program Director, Pulaski Advisory Group