Based on the Spotify Squad Health Check model — a lightweight, team-run self-assessment across qualitative dimensions, distinct from the delivery metrics on the Velocity Chart and Sprint Status Report. Run once at the Sprint 4 midpoint and again at Sprint 8 closeout, in each team's own retrospective, so trend arrows reflect the team's own view of its health, not an external audit.
Green — healthy
Amber — some concern
Red — needs attention
Team Falcon Mobile App
Delivering Value
Are we proud of what we ship?
Easy to Release
Is releasing painless and routine?
Suitable Process
Does our process fit us, not fight us?
Tech Quality
Are we proud of the codebase?
Mission
Do we know why we're here?
Learning
Are we learning enough?
Support
Do we get the help we need?
Speed
Do we deliver fast enough?
Team Anchor Platform/Integration
Delivering Value
Are we proud of what we ship?
Easy to Release
Is releasing painless and routine?
Suitable Process
Does our process fit us, not fight us?
Tech Quality
Are we proud of the codebase?
Mission
Do we know why we're here?
Learning
Are we learning enough?
Support
Do we get the help we need?
Speed
Do we deliver fast enough?
What moved, and why: Falcon's "Easy to Release" and "Tech Quality" both improved from Amber to
Green after the Sprint 2 retrospective action items (dependency-owner tracking, standing Scrum-of-Scrums agenda
item) took hold. Anchor's "Speed" moved from Red to Amber but not to Green — the Sprint 7 migration-remediation
load (see CR-02) was genuinely heavy, and the team was honest that it strained their pace even though the
outcome landed on time. Neither team hit a Red on anything by program end, which C. Tyrrell flagged as a good
sign at the Program Closeout — but "Speed" on both teams staying Amber is deliberately not glossed over here.