← AI Transformation Suite Business Requirements Document

BRD-02: Member & Provider Experience AI

Download Word

Year 2 Workstream — This BRD defines the functional, non-functional, AI model, data, integration, and regulatory requirements for ACME Highland Health's conversational AI capability: a member-facing virtual assistant for self-service and a call-center agent-assist tool for real-time support during live calls. Developed through 7 JAD sessions during Year 2, with the same mandatory governance structure as BRD-01. All governance, testing, and model validation processes follow the Program Governance Model.

Table of Contents

  1. Executive Summary & Business Case
  2. Regulatory & Liability Context
  3. Current State Assessment
  4. Target State & Capability Description
  5. Functional Requirements
  6. AI Model Specifications
  7. Data Requirements
  8. Integration Requirements
  9. Non-Functional Requirements
  10. Human Escalation & Override Requirements
  11. Fairness, Bias & Responsible AI Requirements
  12. Testing & Validation Requirements
  13. Acceptance Criteria & Definition of Done
  14. Constraints, Assumptions & Dependencies
  15. Regulatory Traceability Matrix
  16. BRD-02 Delivery Team & Governance
  17. Sign-Off & Approval

1. Executive Summary & Business Case

ACME Highland Health's member service center handles approximately 2.8 million calls annually across a 650-seat contact center operating Monday–Friday, 7 AM–8 PM ET. Average handle time (AHT) is 8.2 minutes. After-hours coverage is limited to a recorded IVR directing callers to emergency services or callback queues. Of the 2.8 million annual calls, approximately 55% (1.54 million) are routine inquiries — benefits verification, claims status checks, PA status lookups, provider directory searches, ID card replacements, and general plan information — that do not require clinical expertise or complex problem-solving. These calls consume approximately 210,000 agent-hours annually at an average cost of $38 per call (fully loaded: agent salary, facilities, telephony, supervision).

Simultaneously, member satisfaction surveys consistently identify three pain points: (1) long hold times during peak periods (average 6.4 minutes, peak 14+ minutes), (2) no after-hours service for routine inquiries, and (3) inconsistent information quality across agents (agents access 4+ systems during a call and sometimes provide conflicting or incomplete answers). Provider-facing inquiries follow similar patterns: 40% of provider calls are routine eligibility and claims-status checks that could be self-service.

BRD-02 delivers two AI-powered capabilities that address these problems without replacing human agents:

  1. Member-Facing Virtual Assistant: A conversational AI available 24/7 across web, mobile, and voice channels that handles routine inquiries. The virtual assistant is not a chatbot in the traditional sense — it is a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system that answers questions by retrieving verified information from ACME's authoritative documents and generating natural-language responses grounded in that retrieved content. It does not guess, speculate, or generate information beyond what its source documents contain.
  2. Call-Center Agent-Assist: A real-time AI tool that sits alongside human agents during live calls, providing response suggestions, policy lookups, member history summaries, and post-call case summarization. The agent-assist tool speaks to the agent, not to the member — the human agent always controls the conversation with the member.

1.1 Business Objectives

ObjectiveMetricCurrent BaselineTarget (12 months post-production)
Reduce live-agent call volumeAnnual calls handled by live agents2.8M calls1.9M calls (32% deflection to virtual assistant)
Reduce average handle timeAHT for agent-handled calls8.2 minutes5.7 minutes (30% reduction via agent-assist)
Improve first-contact resolution% of inquiries resolved without callback or transfer71%≥ 85%
Improve member satisfactionPost-interaction CSAT score3.6 / 5.0≥ 4.2 / 5.0
Eliminate after-hours gap% of routine inquiries resolvable 24/70% after-hours100% of routine inquiry types available 24/7
Reduce hold timeAverage hold time during peak periods6.4 minutes (peak 14+)≤ 2 minutes (live agents freed by virtual assistant handling routine volume)
Reduce cost per interactionBlended cost per member interaction (agent + AI)$38 per call$12 blended (AI-handled interactions at ~$2; agent-handled at ~$32 with shorter AHT)

1.2 Investment & Timeline

Budget: BRD-02 delivery funded within SOW-02 ($41.58M Year 2, shared with BRD-03 and cross-cutting workstreams). BRD-02-specific delivery labor: approximately $8M of the Year 2 allocation.

Timeline: Year 2 phases follow the same 5-phase gate rhythm as Year 1. BRD-02 JAD sessions: Jan–Mar 2028. Requirements sign-off: Mar 2028. Build: Apr–Jul 2028. Pilot: Aug 2028. Production: Sep 2028.

Team: 22 people, led by X. Garcia (BRD-02 Lead, Pulaski). Includes 2 senior conversational AI engineers, 3 NLP engineers, 2 conversation designers, 2 data scientists, 1 integration engineer, 1 escalation protocol designer (ACME), 1 call-center ops liaison (ACME), and supporting UX research, QA, Scrum, DevOps, accessibility, and documentation roles.

2. Regulatory & Liability Context

2.1 The Air Canada Precedent & Hallucination Liability

Moffatt v. Air Canada (2024) — The Defining Precedent: In this case, Air Canada's customer-service chatbot told a passenger he could receive a bereavement fare discount retroactively after purchasing a full-price ticket. The chatbot was wrong — Air Canada's actual policy required the discount to be applied at time of purchase. When Air Canada argued that the chatbot was a "separate legal entity" and its statements were not binding, the Canadian Civil Resolution Tribunal rejected this defense, ruling that Air Canada was liable for its chatbot's statements regardless of whether the information was accurate. The airline was ordered to pay the fare difference plus damages.

Implication for BRD-02: ACME is legally responsible for every statement its member-facing virtual assistant makes. If the virtual assistant tells a member they are covered for a service and they are not, ACME bears the liability — exactly as if a human agent had made the same incorrect statement. This precedent is the single most important design constraint in BRD-02: the virtual assistant must be designed so that it cannot generate statements about coverage, benefits, or policy that are not grounded in verified source material. The architectural response is RAG with mandatory factual grounding (Section 6).

2.2 HIPAA & PHI in Conversational Data

2.3 Accessibility Requirements

2.4 State Consumer Protection

3. Current State Assessment

3.1 Current Member Service Channels

ChannelVolume (Annual)AvailabilityCapabilitySatisfaction
Phone (live agent)2.8M callsMon–Fri, 7AM–8PM ETFull service — agents can handle any inquiry3.6 / 5.0 CSAT
Member web portal1.2M sessions24/7 (self-service)Claims lookup, benefits summary, ID card request — no conversational support3.1 / 5.0 (survey)
Mobile app400K sessions24/7 (self-service)Same as portal, smaller screen2.9 / 5.0
IVR (automated phone)800K calls (pre-agent)24/7Menu-driven routing; claims status via account number + DOB; no natural language2.3 / 5.0
Fax / mail180K itemsBusiness hours processingPA submissions, appeals, grievances — no routine inquiriesN/A

3.2 Current State Pain Points

4. Target State & Capability Description

4.1 Member-Facing Virtual Assistant

A conversational AI system available 24/7 across web, mobile, and voice channels. The virtual assistant handles routine inquiries conversationally — not through menus or keyword matching, but through natural-language understanding that determines what the member is asking and retrieves a grounded answer from ACME's authoritative data sources.

Core design principle: The virtual assistant answers questions by looking up verified information, not by generating information. It is a retrieval-first system — if the retrieval step does not find a relevant, verified answer, the system does not attempt to generate one. It escalates to a human agent instead. This architecture directly addresses the Moffatt liability risk.

Supported inquiry types (routine):

Unsupported inquiry types (always escalate to human):

4.2 Call-Center Agent-Assist Tool

A real-time AI tool displayed in a side panel alongside the agent's existing desktop interface during live calls. The agent-assist tool listens to the conversation (via real-time speech-to-text), understands the member's inquiry, and provides the agent with:

5. Functional Requirements

Requirements classified using MoSCoW prioritization: Must (non-negotiable for production), Should (expected, can defer with justification), Could (included if capacity allows).

5.1 Virtual Assistant — Core Conversation

FR-02.001 Must

Virtual assistant shall support conversational interactions across web (ACME member portal), mobile app (iOS and Android), and voice (phone channel with IVR integration) with unified conversation context. A member who starts a conversation on web and subsequently calls the phone line shall not be required to re-explain their inquiry — the context transfers.

FR-02.002 Must

Virtual assistant shall handle all 7 supported routine inquiry types (benefits verification, claims status, PA status, provider search, ID card request, general plan information, cost estimation) with a target resolution rate of ≥ 80% without escalation to a human agent. Resolution is defined as: the member's inquiry is answered to their satisfaction and they do not request a human agent.

FR-02.003 Must

Virtual assistant shall identify itself as an AI assistant at the beginning of every interaction and offer the option to speak with a human agent. Disclosure text: "Hi, I'm ACME's virtual assistant. I can help with benefits, claims, and general plan questions. If you'd prefer to speak with a person, just say 'connect me to an agent' at any time." The system shall not impersonate a human or use a human name.

FR-02.004 Must

Virtual assistant shall authenticate the member before accessing any member-specific data (claims, benefits, PA status). Authentication shall use the same multi-factor methods as the existing member portal (member ID + DOB, or portal SSO token). The system shall not access or display member data until authentication is complete.

5.2 Virtual Assistant — Factual Grounding & Hallucination Prevention

FR-02.005 Must

Virtual assistant shall ground every factual response in an authoritative ACME source document. The system shall cite the source in its response (e.g., "According to your Gold Plan Summary of Benefits, Section 4.2, physical therapy visits are covered at 80% after deductible, up to 30 visits per calendar year."). Responses not traceable to a source document shall not be generated.

FR-02.006 Must

If the retrieval step does not identify a relevant passage from the verified source corpus with a retrieval confidence score ≥ 90%, the system shall NOT attempt to generate a response. Instead, the system shall respond: "I want to make sure you get accurate information on that — let me connect you with a service representative who can help." and initiate a warm transfer to a human agent with full conversation context.

FR-02.007 Must

The generation component of the RAG pipeline shall be constrained to use only information present in the retrieved passages. The system shall not extrapolate, infer, or synthesize information beyond what the source documents explicitly state. If a member asks a question that requires interpretation of policy language (e.g., "Does my plan cover this experimental treatment?"), the system shall present the relevant policy language verbatim and recommend speaking with a service representative for interpretation.

FR-02.008 Must

The verified source corpus shall be maintained by ACME's medical policy and benefits administration teams — not by the AI system or the delivery team. The corpus shall be versioned, and the virtual assistant shall always use the current version. When a plan document, benefits summary, or medical policy is updated, the corresponding corpus entries shall be refreshed within 24 hours. Stale answers due to outdated corpus entries are treated as a production incident.

5.3 Virtual Assistant — Escalation to Human Agent

FR-02.009 Must

Virtual assistant shall detect member emotional distress signals (frustration language, repeated escalation requests, profanity, expressions of confusion or helplessness) using the sentiment analysis model (M-08) and initiate immediate warm transfer to a human agent with priority flagging. The system shall not attempt to resolve or de-escalate the situation itself.

FR-02.010 Must

When a member explicitly requests a human agent — through any phrasing ("talk to a person," "connect me to someone," "I want a real person," "agent," "representative," etc.) — the system shall initiate transfer within one conversational turn. The system shall NOT attempt to retain the member, suggest it can help, or ask the member to try one more thing. Honoring the human-escalation request is immediate and unconditional.

FR-02.011 Must

All escalations from virtual assistant to human agent shall be warm transfers: the agent receives the full conversation history, member authentication status, member history summary, and the virtual assistant's assessment of the inquiry topic. The member shall not be required to re-explain their issue or re-authenticate.

FR-02.012 Must

If escalation is requested outside business hours (when no live agents are available), the system shall offer two options: (a) schedule a callback for the next business day with the inquiry context preserved, or (b) provide the phone number for ACME's after-hours nurse line (for clinical concerns). The system shall clearly state that no live agent is currently available and provide an estimated callback time.

5.4 Agent-Assist Tool

FR-02.013 Must

Agent-assist tool shall provide real-time response suggestions in a side panel visible to the agent during live calls. Suggestions shall be generated from the same verified source corpus as the virtual assistant, ensuring consistency between AI-assisted and agent-delivered information. The agent decides whether to use, modify, or ignore each suggestion — the tool is advisory, not authoritative.

FR-02.014 Must

Agent-assist tool shall display a member history summary at call start: recent calls (last 90 days with topic), open claims and status, open PAs and status, recent portal activity, and any open complaints or appeals. Summary generated within 3 seconds of call connection.

FR-02.015 Must

Agent-assist tool shall generate a real-time case summarization as the call progresses, capturing: key topics discussed, member requests, agent commitments, actions taken, and recommended follow-up. At call close, the summary shall auto-populate the case management system, reducing after-call work. Target ACW reduction: 40% (from average 2.3 minutes to ≤ 1.4 minutes).

FR-02.016 Should

Agent-assist tool shall detect call sentiment in real-time and display a sentiment indicator (neutral / positive / frustrated / distressed) visible to the agent. If sentiment is "distressed" for >2 minutes, supervisor notification shall be triggered automatically. Sentiment data shall be aggregated (not per-call) for quality and training analytics.

FR-02.017 Should

Agent-assist tool shall track agent usage patterns: which suggestions are accepted, modified, or ignored. Usage analytics reported monthly to BRD-02 product team for model improvement and agent training needs identification. Individual agent usage data is accessible only by the agent's supervisor and HR; it shall not be used for punitive purposes without HR policy review.

5.5 Audit, Reporting & Compliance

FR-02.018 Must

System shall maintain a complete audit trail for every virtual assistant interaction: session ID, member ID (authenticated), timestamps, full conversation transcript (member messages + system responses), retrieval sources cited, confidence scores, escalation events, and resolution status. Audit trail immutable and retained per ACME retention policy (minimum 7 years).

FR-02.019 Must

System shall support quality audit sampling: a configurable percentage of virtual assistant interactions (default: 5%) randomly selected for human review. Reviewers assess: factual accuracy, source citation correctness, escalation appropriateness, and member satisfaction. Discrepancies logged and reported to AI Governance Board.

FR-02.020 Must

System shall generate operational reporting: daily/weekly/monthly volumes (by channel, inquiry type, resolution type), escalation rate, resolution rate, average interaction duration, member satisfaction (post-interaction survey), and hallucination incident count. Reports available on demand for any reporting period.

6. AI Model Specifications

6.1 Model Architecture

BRD-02 uses a multi-model architecture. Each model has a specific function, its own training/tuning approach, and its own validation criteria.

ModelTypeFunctionPerformance Target
M-06: Conversational AI Engine (RAG)Retrieval-Augmented Generation (LLM + vector retrieval)Retrieve relevant passages from verified source corpus, generate natural-language responses grounded in retrieved contentFactual accuracy ≥ 97%; Hallucination rate ≤ 0.5%; Source citation accuracy ≥ 99%
M-07: Intent ClassifierMulti-class Classification (fine-tuned transformer)Classify member inquiry intent (benefits, claims, PA, provider, cost, ID card, complaint, other) to route to appropriate resolution path or escalationIntent accuracy ≥ 93%; Complaint detection recall ≥ 98%
M-08: Sentiment AnalyzerSequence Classification (text + optional voice prosody)Detect member emotional state (neutral, positive, frustrated, distressed) from conversation text and voice characteristicsSentiment accuracy ≥ 85%; Distress detection recall ≥ 95% (minimize false negatives — missed distress is worse than false alarm)
M-09: Case SummarizerExtractive + Abstractive SummarizationGenerate call summaries from conversation transcripts for agent-assist post-call documentation and case management integrationSummary completeness ≥ 90% (all key topics captured); Factual fidelity ≥ 98% (no hallucinated commitments or actions)

6.2 Hallucination Prevention Architecture (M-06 Detail)

M-06 is the highest-risk model in BRD-02. Its architecture is specifically designed to prevent the Moffatt scenario:

  1. Retrieval step: When a member asks a question, the system first queries a vector database of verified ACME source documents (benefits summaries, plan documents, medical policies, provider directory, claims/PA records). The retrieval step returns the top-K most relevant passages with a relevance score.
  2. Confidence gate: If no retrieved passage has a relevance score ≥ 0.90, the system bypasses generation entirely and escalates to a human agent. This is the primary hallucination-prevention mechanism: the model cannot generate a response when it has nothing verified to ground it in.
  3. Constrained generation: If relevant passages are retrieved, the LLM generates a response constrained to use only information present in those passages. The system prompt explicitly instructs: "Answer using only the information in the provided context. Do not add information not present in the context. If the context does not contain enough information to answer, say so and offer to connect the member with a representative."
  4. Citation verification: After generation, a post-processing step verifies that every factual claim in the response maps to a passage in the retrieved context. Claims that cannot be traced are removed and the response is regenerated or the system escalates.
  5. Source corpus version control: The vector database is updated within 24 hours of any source document change (plan update, policy revision, benefits change). Stale-corpus incidents are treated as production incidents.
Adversarial hallucination test set: Independent Model Validation maintains a test set of 500+ questions specifically designed to provoke hallucination: questions about policies that don't exist, services ACME doesn't cover, contradictory premises, and edge cases at the boundary of policy language. Target: ≤ 0.5% hallucination rate (≤ 2.5 hallucinated responses out of 500). This test set is expanded quarterly based on production incidents and member feedback.

6.3 Model Training & Tuning

6.4 Production Monitoring

7. Data Requirements

Data ElementSource SystemClassificationAccess Control
Member demographics & eligibilityCore admin platformPII + PHIOnshore US only; RBAC; authenticated access only
Benefits summary documents (per plan)Benefits admin / document mgmtInternal / ProprietaryRead access for RAG retrieval
Claims history (per member)Claims processing systemPHIOnshore US only; RBAC; authenticated access only
PA status (per member)PA management systemPHIOnshore US only; RBAC; authenticated access only
Provider directoryProvider management systemNon-sensitivePublic data (directory); network status is plan-specific
Medical policy documentsMedical policy systemInternal / ProprietaryRead access for RAG retrieval
Historical call transcripts (training)Call recording systemPHIDe-identified before model training; onshore only
Conversation logs (production)Virtual assistant platformPHIOnshore US only; RBAC; retained per policy

8. Integration Requirements

IntegrationProtocolDirectionLatency Requirement
Core admin platform (eligibility, benefits)REST API / internalRead≤ 500ms per query
Claims processing system (status)REST API / internalRead≤ 1 second per query
PA management system (status)REST API / internalRead≤ 1 second per query
Provider directory APIREST APIRead≤ 1 second (geo-search)
Member portal (web)Embedded widget / SSOBidirectionalWidget loads ≤ 2 seconds
Mobile app (iOS/Android)Native SDK / APIBidirectionalResponse ≤ 3 seconds
IVR / telephony platform (voice)SIP + STT/TTS APIBidirectionalVoice response ≤ 2 seconds
Call center desktop (agent-assist)Side-panel widget / APIRead (from call stream) + Write (to case mgmt)Suggestions ≤ 3 seconds after utterance
Case management systemREST API / internalWrite (summary auto-population)At call close
Data & Cloud AI Platform FoundationMLOps pipeline (internal)BidirectionalModel deployment, monitoring, retraining

9. Non-Functional Requirements

9.1 Performance

9.2 Availability & Resilience

9.3 Security

9.4 Accessibility

10. Human Escalation & Override Requirements

BRD-02's escalation model is confidence-based and member-directed, fundamentally different from BRD-01's adverse-determination-triggered model. The system escalates whenever it cannot provide a grounded answer OR whenever the member requests it — whichever comes first.

10.1 Escalation Triggers (Virtual Assistant)

TriggerActionTimeline
Retrieval confidence < 90%Do not generate response; warm transfer to agent with contextImmediate (within current turn)
Complaint or grievance intent detected (M-07)Warm transfer to agent; do not attempt resolutionImmediate
Emotional distress detected (M-08, distress label)Warm transfer to agent with priority flag; supervisor notifiedImmediate
Member explicitly requests human agentWarm transfer — no retention attempt, no deflectionWithin 1 conversational turn
Complex multi-step inquiry detectedProactively offer human transfer: "This involves a few steps — would you like me to continue or connect you with a representative?"After inquiry classification
3+ failed resolution attempts on same inquiryAuto-escalate to human agent with conversation contextAfter 3rd attempt
Member requests information the system cannot verifyDecline to answer; offer human transferImmediate

10.2 Agent-Assist Override

11. Fairness, Bias & Responsible AI Requirements

12. Testing & Validation Requirements

Test TypeOwnerCriteriaPhase
Unit TestingBRD-02 development team≥ 80% code coveragePhase 2 (continuous)
Integration TestingQA team (V. Müller)All 10 integrations tested end-to-endPhase 2
Model Accuracy Testing (all 4 models)Independent Validation (P. Okafor)All models meet accuracy targets (Section 6.1)Phase 3
Adversarial Hallucination Testing (M-06)Independent Validation (P. Okafor)Hallucination rate ≤ 0.5% on 500+ adversarial questionsPhase 3
Fairness / Response Parity TestingIndependent Validation (P. Okafor)≤ 5% demographic deviation in accuracy and escalation ratePhase 3
Security / Prompt Injection TestingCybersecurity (M. Hassan)Zero Critical, zero High at release; prompt injection defenses verifiedPhase 3
Accessibility Testing (WCAG 2.1 AA)Accessibility Specialist (Y. Nakamura4)Full WCAG 2.1 AA conformance across web, mobile, voicePhase 3
Voice Channel Accent TestingQA team + UX ResearchSTT accuracy ≤ 5% variance across accent groupsPhase 3
Performance / Load TestingQA teamP95 latency within thresholds at 3× peak concurrent sessionsPhase 3
DR/BCP TestingIT Ops (H. Nakamura)Recovery within RTO (2 hrs) / RPO (30 min)Phase 3
Pilot UAT (member panel)Operational Testing Manager≥ 90% task completion rate; CSAT ≥ 4.0 from pilot panelPhase 3
Full UATOperational Testing Manager≥ 95% pass rate; zero open Critical/High defectsPhase 3/4

13. Acceptance Criteria & Definition of Done

BRD-02 is accepted into production when ALL of the following criteria are met:

  1. All "Must" functional requirements (FR-02.001 through FR-02.020) implemented and tested
  2. All 4 AI models pass Independent Model Validation (zero Critical, zero uncorrected High)
  3. Hallucination rate ≤ 0.5% on adversarial test set (500+ questions)
  4. Factual accuracy ≥ 97% on benchmark Q&A set
  5. UAT passed (≥ 95% pass rate, zero open Critical/High defects)
  6. Pilot member panel: ≥ 90% task completion rate and CSAT ≥ 4.0
  7. Accessibility testing passed (WCAG 2.1 AA across all channels)
  8. Voice accent parity verified (≤ 5% STT variance)
  9. Security testing passed (zero Critical/High; prompt injection defenses verified)
  10. Escalation workflows verified end-to-end (confidence-based, complaint-based, explicit request, after-hours)
  11. Agent-assist tool verified with live agent panel (suggestion quality, latency, case summarization accuracy)
  12. All 3 governance boards sign off at Phase 3 gate
  13. Production monitoring dashboards operational (hallucination, escalation rate, CSAT, latency)
  14. Runbook and operational documentation delivered to IT Operations and call center management

14. Constraints, Assumptions & Dependencies

14.1 Constraints

14.2 Assumptions

14.3 Dependencies

15. Regulatory Traceability Matrix

Regulation / StandardRequirementBRD-02 ImplementationVerification
Moffatt v. Air Canada (precedent)Organization liable for AI agent's factual statementsRAG architecture with factual grounding (FR-02.005–008); hallucination rate ≤ 0.5%Adversarial hallucination testing; weekly production monitoring
HIPAA / HITECHPHI protection for conversation dataEncryption, RBAC, authentication before data access (FR-02.004), audit trail (FR-02.018)Security testing; privacy impact assessment
State AI disclosure lawsDisclose AI nature to consumersFR-02.003 (mandatory AI self-identification at start of every interaction)UAT verification
ADA / Section 508Accessibility for members with disabilitiesWCAG 2.1 AA (Section 9.4); voice channel accessibilityAccessibility testing (dedicated specialist)
NIST AI RMFGovern, Map, Measure, ManageBRD-02 operates under full AI Governance framework (Section 16)AI Governance Board oversight

16. BRD-02 Delivery Team & Governance

Team size: 22 people. Lead: X. Garcia (Pulaski). Full roster in Resource Plan, Team 22.

Governance: BRD-02 operates under the full Project Catalyst governance framework. Sprint-level execution uses 2-week sprints with Scrum Master (T. Okoro5), Product Manager (K. Nakashima4), and daily standups. All model releases require Independent Model Validation sign-off and AI Governance Board approval.

Business Sponsor: M. Washington (VP Customer Service Operations, ACME) — owns business requirements, call-center workflow validation, and member experience standards. Works with the Escalation Protocol Designer (Q. Rutherford3, ACME) and Call Center Ops Liaison (R. Alvarado3, ACME) to ensure the AI capabilities integrate with existing call-center operations.

17. Sign-Off & Approval

RoleNameSign-Off ScopeStatus
Business SponsorM. Washington (VP Customer Ops)Business requirements, call-center workflow, member experienceApproved — Phase 1 Gate (Year 2)
Legal CounselR. ThorneLiability risk assessment (hallucination, member-facing AI, Air Canada precedent)Approved — Phase 1 Gate (Year 2)
VP ComplianceJ. MartinezRegulatory alignment (HIPAA, state AI disclosure, accessibility)Approved — Phase 1 Gate (Year 2)
Chief ArchitectD. ChenTechnical feasibility, integration architecture, multi-channelApproved — Phase 1 Gate (Year 2)
CISOM. HassanSecurity, PHI handling for conversational data, prompt injection defensesApproved — Phase 1 Gate (Year 2)
AI Governance DirectorS. KhuranaModel governance, hallucination risk management, RAG architecture approvalApproved — Phase 1 Gate (Year 2)
BRD-02 LeadX. GarciaTechnical achievabilityApproved — Phase 1 Gate (Year 2)
Program DirectorC. TyrrellFacilitation (does not sign off on requirements)Acknowledged