← Aerospace Manufacturing Suite CWP-700 · Quality System

Control Plan (AS9145)

Download Word

The AS9145 Control Plan for the CWP-700 Composite Wing Panel — the document that enumerates every controlled characteristic on the part, states how each is controlled and verified, and fixes its inspection intensity. It is the flow-down target named in the Inspection, Test & Verification Strategy §05: Key Characteristics identified from Meridian's engineering source data flow down into the control plan, the router and the inspection method sheet. This is that control plan, and it is the requirements baseline the program's quality system is built to satisfy.

14
Controlled characteristics
6
Key Characteristics (100%)
5
Critical process parameters
3
Standard characteristics
AS9145
Control-plan discipline

01 Purpose & why a composite part needs this document

A machined metal part can largely be inspected after the fact — its geometry is set by cutting, and what was cut can be measured. A composite panel cannot. Its most critical properties — cure quality, void content, porosity, ply orientation, bond integrity — are created inside an autoclave and cannot be restored by rework once they are wrong. That single fact drives this entire plan: for a composite structure, quality is built in during processing and can only be confirmed afterward, never added. The Control Plan is where that principle becomes specific — it names each characteristic, ties it to the process step that creates it, and states the control that keeps it right the first time.

The plan is organized around a distinction that governs everything downstream: the difference between a characteristic verified after processing and a process parameter controlled during it. A wing panel's hole positions can be measured on the finished part; its cure quality cannot — by the time the part exists, the cure is history. So the plan controls both, differently, and says which is which.

Where the Control Plan sits in AS9145

AS9145 structures product quality planning in five phases — planning, product design, process design, product & process validation, and ongoing production with feedback. The Control Plan is the artifact that carries forward from process design into validation and then governs ongoing production; it is not a document written once and filed. It is established during process design, validated at First Article Inspection, and then becomes the living reference that production runs against. On the CWP-700 that lifecycle is visible in the program's own milestones: the Control Plan's characteristics are what the First Article Inspection (accepted 25 Sep 2026) ballooned and verified, and Production Release Authorization (11 Nov 2026) is the point at which the validated plan begins governing full production. The plan a reader sees here is the validated plan — the one that survived FAI and now controls the line.

02 Characteristic classification & what it decides

Every characteristic on the drawing falls into one of three classes. The class does not decide whether a characteristic is verified — every characteristic is verified — it decides how intensively, and whether control happens on the finished part or inside the process.

ClassDefinitionPhase-2 inspection intensity
Key CharacteristicVariation materially affects fit, structural performance or safety. Identified from Meridian engineering source data.100% — never sampled, SPC-monitored
Critical process parameterCreated inside the autoclave or during processing; cannot be restored by rework once wrong.100% of cycles, automated record + alarm on excursion
Standard characteristicReal drawing requirements, but variation does not affect fit, structure or safety.Verified 100% in Phase 1; sampling once capability (Cpk) is demonstrated
The lesson already learned on this program. Issue I-01 was a First Article dimensional nonconformance — edge trim out of tolerance on 2 of 8 panel positions on the initial tooling run. Edge trim is a standard characteristic (SC-01), not a Key Characteristic, and it still stopped the First Article Inspection. The rule this Control Plan embeds: classification determines sampling intensity, not whether a characteristic is verified at all. Every characteristic on the drawing is verified; the class only decides how often.

Where Key Characteristics come from — and why the classification isn't Acme's to invent

Key Characteristics are not chosen by the manufacturer for convenience. They are identified from Meridian's engineering source data — the drawings, specifications and stress analysis that define which features carry load, mate to the airframe, or affect flight safety. Acme flows those down into this Control Plan; it does not originate them. That direction matters: a manufacturer that reclassified a customer's Key Characteristic as standard in order to sample it rather than inspect it 100% would be substituting its own convenience for the customer's engineering judgment about what keeps the aircraft safe. The Control Plan records the classification so that this boundary is explicit and auditable — a Key Characteristic is a Key Characteristic because Meridian's engineering says so, and the plan traces back to that source rather than asserting the classification on its own authority.

03 Where each control sits in the process

The Control Plan maps to the manufacturing router. Reading left to right is reading the panel being built — and it shows why control has to be in-process: by the time the part reaches final inspection, four of the five critical process parameters are already locked into the laminate.

STEP 1
Material control
Prepreg receipt, lot certification, freezer & out-time control. Governs CPP-05.
STEP 2
Layup & debulk
Ply placement and orientation, vacuum bag preparation. Governs KC-06, CPP-04.
STEP 3
Autoclave cure
Temperature ramp, dwell, pressure. The point of no rework. Governs CPP-01/02/03.
STEP 4
NDT
Ultrasonic C-scan for bond integrity, void content, porosity. Confirms KC-04, KC-05.
STEP 5
Metrology & trim
CMM for hole position, contour, thickness; edge trim. Confirms KC-01/02/03, SC-01/02/03.
Three of the four post-cure verifications are confirmations, not gates that can save the part. NDT and metrology (steps 4–5) can detect a bad cure, a void, a disbond — but they cannot fix one. That is why the critical process parameters in step 3 carry 100% automated recording with alarms: on a composite, the only place a cure defect can be prevented is the autoclave, so that is where the tightest control sits. Inspection catches what control missed; it is the backstop, not the primary defense.

04 Key Characteristics (6 — 100%, never sampled)

Key Characteristics are verified on every panel, for the life of the program. They are the characteristics whose variation reaches fit, structure or safety, so the sampling transition that applies to standard characteristics (§06) never applies to them — not in Phase 2, not at full rate, not ever.

IDCharacteristic & specificationCreated / verified atControl & verification methodAffects
KC-01Interface hole positions
True position of wing-to-fuselage interface holes, per Meridian engineering drawing datum scheme
Post-cure metrologyDimensional metrology (CMM), 100% of featuresFit / assembly
KC-02Panel contour / profile
Aerodynamic surface profile within drawing tolerance envelope
Post-cure metrologyCMM / laser scan against master model, 100%Aerodynamic performance
KC-03Laminate thickness at load-bearing locations
Cured laminate thickness at defined structural stations
Layup + post-cureUltrasonic thickness + dimensional, 100% at defined stationsStructural strength
KC-04Bond-line integrity
Freedom from disbond / delamination at bonded interfaces
Post-cure NDTUltrasonic C-scan NDT (NAS 410 Level II), 100%Structural / safety
KC-05Void content / porosity
Void content within specification limit for structural laminate
Post-cure NDTUltrasonic NDT + witness-coupon cross-section, 100% of panelsStructural / safety
KC-06Ply orientation
Ply layup sequence and fiber orientation per engineering laminate schedule
LayupLaser projection + traveler verification, 100%Structural strength

05 Critical process parameters (5 — 100% of cycles)

Critical process parameters are not measured on the part — they are controlled while the part is being made. Each is recorded automatically for 100% of cure cycles, with an alarm on any excursion beyond the qualified process window, because an excursion that is not caught in real time cannot be caught at all: the laminate has already cured around it.

IDParameter & specificationControlled atControl & recording methodAffects
CPP-01Cure cycle temperature ramp rate
Ramp rate within qualified process window
Autoclave cureAutomated cure record + alarm on excursion, 100% of cyclesCure quality
CPP-02Cure dwell temperature & time
Dwell temperature and hold time within qualified window
Autoclave cureAutomated cure record, 100% of cyclesCure quality
CPP-03Autoclave pressure
Consolidation pressure within qualified window
Autoclave cureAutomated cure record + alarm, 100% of cyclesVoid / porosity control
CPP-04Vacuum integrity
Vacuum bag integrity maintained through cure
Layup / cure prepPre-cure vacuum leak check, 100% of bagsVoid / porosity control
CPP-05Prepreg out-time
Cumulative out-of-freezer time within material specification
Material handlingOut-time log + freezer control, 100% of material lotsMaterial / cure quality

06 Standard characteristics & the sampling transition (3)

Standard characteristics are real drawing requirements — I-01 proved they can stop an inspection — but their variation does not reach fit, structure or safety. They are the only class eligible for the sampling transition: verified 100% in Phase 1, then sampled once the process has demonstrated capability on them.

IDCharacteristic & specificationVerified atVerification methodPhase-2 intensity
SC-01Edge trim dimensions
Trimmed panel edge dimensions within drawing tolerance
Edge trimDimensional inspectionSampling once Cpk demonstrated
SC-02Non-structural dimensions
Secondary dimensions with no structural or interface function
Post-trimDimensional inspectionSampling once Cpk demonstrated
SC-03Cosmetic surface finish
Surface finish and appearance per workmanship standard
Post-cure / trimVisual inspection to workmanship standardSampling once capability demonstrated
Sampling is earned, and it is reversible. A standard characteristic transitions to sampling only after the process demonstrates statistical capability on it (a stable, in-control chart above the agreed Cpk threshold). If capability is later lost — the chart goes out of control — the characteristic automatically reverts to 100% inspection until capability is re-established. Sampling is a privilege the process earns by proving it is stable, not a cost-saving default; the Test Strategy §10 owns the mechanics of the transition and the reversion trigger.

07 Standards & ownership

The Control Plan is governed by the aerospace quality standards the suite already operates under, and each characteristic class has a named owner accountable for its control.

StandardRole in this Control Plan
AS9100DQuality management system requirements; the Control Plan is a required output of production planning
AS9145 (APQP/PPAP)Advanced product quality planning; the control-plan discipline itself and the five-phase framework
AS9102First Article Inspection; the Control Plan's characteristics are the FAI ballooned features
NAS 410NDT personnel qualification (Level II) for the ultrasonic C-scan verifications
NADCAPSpecial-process accreditation for the autoclave cure and NDT operations
OwnerRoleControl-plan accountability
R. KesslerQuality Engineering Lead (AS9100 QMS Owner)Owns the Control Plan as a QMS document; characteristic classification and the sampling-transition governance
M. OseiManufacturing EngineerOwns the router mapping — each control's placement in the process and the layup/cure travelers
L. VanceMaterials / NDT EngineerOwns the NDT verifications (KC-04/05) and material out-time control (CPP-05)
S. PhamSupplier Quality Engineer (PPAP)Owns incoming prepreg PPAP and lot certification feeding CPP-05
C. TyrrellProgram ManagerAccountable for the Control Plan as a program deliverable and the FAI gate it supports

08 How the classification governs nonconformance disposition

The characteristic class does more than set inspection intensity — it constrains what can be done with a part when something goes wrong. When a nonconformance is found, the Material Review Board dispositions it, and the Control Plan classification is the first thing the MRB checks, because it determines which dispositions are even available.

If the nonconformance touches…Disposition constraint
A Key CharacteristicUse-as-is is not available on the manufacturer's authority. A KC nonconformance affects fit, structure or safety by definition, so any disposition other than rework-to-drawing, scrap, or repair-to-approved-scheme requires Meridian engineering concurrence — the same source that classified it.
A critical process parameterA cure excursion cannot be dispositioned use-as-is by inspecting the part, because the property it affects (cure quality, void content) cannot be fully confirmed by post-cure inspection. Destructive coupon evidence or engineering disposition is required.
A standard characteristicThe full range of MRB dispositions is available, including use-as-is where the nonconformance is shown not to affect form, fit or function — as with the I-01 edge-trim finding, once re-inspected and dispositioned.
This is why classification is a safety control, not paperwork. The class assigned in this plan decides, months later and under production pressure, whether a nonconforming part can be shipped on an engineer's signature or must go back to the drawing. Getting the classification right — and tracing it to Meridian's engineering source — is what keeps that later decision honest.

09 How this plan is used across the program

The Control Plan is not a standalone document; it is the hub several other artifacts point at. It is the baseline the Inspection, Test & Verification Strategy flows down from (§05), the characteristic list the First Article Inspection balloons and verifies (AS9102), and the reference the Material Review Board uses to judge whether a nonconformance touches a Key Characteristic — the classification that determines whether a disposition is even eligible for use-as-is. When Meridian's engineering source data changes a characteristic, this plan is where the change lands first, and the router, inspection sheets and FAI follow from it. That is what makes it the program's requirements baseline: it is the single enumerated list of what the part must be, against which everything else verifies.

This document unblocks the suite's requirements traceability. Until this Control Plan, the aerospace suite verified quality thoroughly but had no enumerated requirements artifact — nothing that listed the controlled characteristics as identified items a matrix could trace from. With KC-01–06, CPP-01–05 and SC-01–03 defined here, the Requirements Traceability Matrix now traces each characteristic to its verification method, its FAI evidence record and its acceptance path — the same requirement→verification→acceptance discipline the other suites' RTMs provide.